Check the customer's purchase order against the quote you sent
Compares an incoming purchase order line by line against your quote and lists the discrepancies before the order is booked, not at invoicing.
- How it works
- When a purchase order arrives, the large model compares it line by line against your quote: quantities, prices, part numbers, delivery terms, payment terms. It outputs a short discrepancy list — 'PO says 90 days payment, quote said 30' — so mismatches surface before the order is booked rather than at invoicing.
- Data you need
- The quote and the PO, both as text — a system export or a text-layer PDF — plus a note of which discrepancies matter to you (price and terms always; description wording perhaps not).
- What to expect
- The comparison is only as good as the extraction of both documents, and heavily formatted POs from big customers' ERP systems can trip it. Scanned or faxed POs — still common in B2B — need OCR first, as no vision model is served. It flags differences; deciding whose terms prevail is a commercial and legal call.
- Where people stay involved
- A person confirms each flagged discrepancy against the originals before raising it with the customer, and spot-checks 'no discrepancies' results early on — a missed mismatch is the dangerous failure, and an extraction error can hide one.
Which model, and what it costs to run
Qwen3-8B
This job answers while someone waits, so latency comes first: we hold it to a single small card and, within that, take the best independent score on sticking to the document.
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
- Weights at 4-bit
- 5 GB
- Context
- 32K tokens
- Publisher
- Alibaba (Qwen Team)
What the hardware costs
One 48 GB card holds it
- Rent in the EU
- $1.60/hrScaleway, Paris (PAR2)
- Buy the card
- $7,569new, one-off
- Or rent it by the token
- $0.04 / $0.04per M in / out · DeepInfra
Hardware only, third-party prices from 2026-07. The figure excludes the KV cache, which grows with context length and how many people use it at once — sized properly in a conversation, not guessed here. Renting by the token is cheaper up front; why our customers still self-host is below.
Reading a long document whole
No benchmark measures this
No current benchmark ranks today's open models here. HELMET showed that the popular test — finding a planted sentence — predicts nothing, and its own table has not been rerun on 2026 models.
So we do not show a chart here. We measure it on your own content, in the first week, and you see the result before anything ships.
Sticking to the document
Measured on public documents, by a model acting as judge. Read it beside the answer rate: the lowest hallucination rates on this board belong to models that simply decline more often.
Independent measurement · Vectara · board updated May 11, 2026
The API is cheaper per token. Here is why our customers don't use it.
We will not pretend otherwise: renting a model by the token from a serverless API costs less per million tokens than a card we run for you. We show that price on every use-case page. What it does not include is the part a shop with a customer database actually pays for.
- 01
Your data never leaves hardware you can point at
A serverless "we don't retain your data" is a clause in a contract. Running the model on a card in Amsterdam is a fact of architecture: your catalogue, tickets and customer records are never sent to a third party at all. For a GDPR audit, that is the difference between a promise and a floor plan.
- 02
The price cannot move without your say-so
A serverless rate card is somebody else's lever. The provider can raise the price, retire the model, or change the terms, and your cost moves with it. The same model on the same card costs the same next year — you own the number.
- 03
The model cannot be taken away
Hosted APIs deprecate models on their own schedule; the one you built on can be gone in a quarter. An open-weight model on your own hardware runs for as long as you keep the lights on. No vendor can end-of-life it out from under you.
And the price gap closes with volume: past a card you keep busy — very roughly four billion tokens a month — owning is cheaper outright, even before the three reasons above.
Getting a case like this one from a conversation to production takes about two months, and you can stop at the end of any phase.
Also in sales & b2b
All 15 →Draft a quote from a customer's enquiry email and your price list
Turns an inbound enquiry and your price list into a filled-in quote draft for a salesperson to check and send — a document to correct, not a blank page.
Pull the line items out of RFQ emails and PDFs into a spreadsheet
Extracts part numbers, quantities, units and dates from RFQ emails and PDFs into one consistent table, instead of someone retyping them.
Sort incoming sales emails: real enquiry, existing customer, supplier, junk
Tags every email hitting the sales inbox — new enquiry, existing customer, supplier, junk — within seconds, so real enquiries reach the right person.
Grade new leads against your own definition of a good customer
Scores each new enquiry against your written definition of a good customer, with a short 'why' note the salesperson can read and disagree with.
Next
Tell us what your team does by hand
Describe the process that takes the most time. We will say plainly whether a model is the right tool for it.